Relationship Analysis Benchmark

Comprehensive Benchmark Winner

Clarity Plan

Across multiple evaluations, the Clarity Plan consistently emerges as the winner based on its superior academic rigor, professional presentation, psychological depth, and evidence-based approach.

Average Final Scores

These scores represent the averaged performance across all independent benchmarks conducted.

Clarity Plan

66/80

(82.5%)

Foundation Plan

60/80

(75.0%)

ChatGPT Plus

58/80

(72.5%)

Strengths at a Glance

The best choice depends on what you value most: academic rigor, practical utility, or a balanced approach.

Clarity Plan

Best for: Academic/clinical quality, research-backed insights, and deep psychological understanding.

Foundation Plan

Best for: A balanced approach with strong emotional intelligence and improved analytical depth.

ChatGPT Plus (Generic)

Best for: Immediate, practical application, situational accuracy, and clear, actionable steps.

Average Score Breakdown

Explore the granular, side-by-side scoring, averaged across all benchmarks. This table shows the combined performance across all eight key metrics.

Criterion	Analysis 13 Engine Clarity Plan (Avg. Score)	Analysis 8 Engine Foundation Plan (Avg. Score)	GPT 4o ChatGPT Plus (Avg. Score)
1. Specificity & Precision	8/10 Highly precise and consistent Uses specific therapeutic frameworks	7/10 Good balance of narrative and specifics Generally precise terminology	7/10 Clear, direct, and actionable language Practical over clinical specificity
2. Supporting Evidence	7/10 Consistently provides citations Evidence-based approach	4/10 Some research mentioned Lacks consistent statistical backing	2/10 No academic citations provided Analysis is primarily intuition-based
3. Psychological Depth	9/10 Excellent use of complex concepts Integrates multiple psychological theories	8/10 Strong psychological insights Good analytical depth	7/10 Good emotional intelligence Analysis is more practical than deep
4. Practical Actionability	9/10 Provides actionable therapeutic advice Strong future-focused exercises	8/10 Very specific and practical action items Detailed conversation scripts	9/10 Top-tier for immediate, clear steps Excellent decision-making frameworks
5. Situational Accuracy	8/10 Strong understanding of situation Accurately captures core dynamics	8/10 Strong situational awareness Effectively captures cultural nuances	9/10 Laser-focused on the exact situation Highly tailored and specific solutions
6. Communication Guidance	7/10 Good conversation guidance Provides detailed advice	8/10 Detailed scripts for various scenarios Strong communication frameworks	8/10 Excellent scripts and strategies Predicts realistic responses
7. Emotional Intelligence	9/10 Consistently empathetic and balanced Sophisticated emotional analysis	9/10 Excellent empathy for both parties Highly compassionate framing	9/10 Exceptional emotional clarity Cuts to the emotional core effectively
8. Professional Quality	9/10 Professional academic presentation Well-structured and polished	8/10 Good, clear structure Professional and well-organized	7/10 Direct, easy-to-read style Format is less polished

Individual Benchmark Results

For transparency, the results from each independent evaluation are provided below.

Benchmark 1: Case Study A

Criterion	Analysis 13 Engine (Clarity Plan)	Analysis 8 Engine (Foundation Plan)	GPT 4o (ChatGPT Plus)
Specificity & Precision	8	6	7
Supporting Evidence	9	5	2
Psychological Depth	9	7	6
Practical Actionability	9	8	9
Situational Accuracy	8	8	9
Communication Guidance	7	8	8
Emotional Intelligence	9	8	9
Professional Quality	9	7	6
TOTAL	68 / 80	57 / 80	56 / 80

Benchmark 2: Case Study B

Criterion	Analysis 13 Engine (Clarity Plan)	Analysis 8 Engine (Foundation Plan)	GPT 4o (ChatGPT Plus)
Specificity & Precision	8	8	7
Supporting Evidence	5	2	1
Psychological Depth	9	9	8
Practical Actionability	8	8	9
Situational Accuracy	8	8	8
Communication Guidance	7	8	8
Emotional Intelligence	9	9	9
Professional Quality	9	8	7
TOTAL	63 / 80	60 / 80	57 / 80